Blog 3: local government funding

Varying levels of government are so intertwined that prosperity or disruptance at any level has a ripple effect, expanding outward and inevitably affecting all other levels accordingly. Each level is saving revenue by passing the problem on to a lower government to deal with. The State of New York is cutting the budget allotted to the specific counties, largely affecting social services.
If it were up to me, I would cut the eligibility and amount of welfare. Many people on welfare are eligible because of income, while realistically, they are well enough suited for a job and are taking advantage of the service. I understand that it is necessary for those who absolutely need assistance in order to provide for their families, but this is not the case for many. If someone is physically and mentally capable to perform a certain job, but choose not to, they should not be able to take advantage of the system and receive help from taxpayers. Also, while our community is extremely fortunate to have such extensive services for the elderly, I feel as though the abundance of cost- free recreation items such as centers for crafts and billiards could be scaled down.
Too much money is spent to make the area look presentable, have recreational items, and account for people not doing their part to provide for themselves. At the same time, funding is being cut across the board, losing revenue for necessary services. The DOT plans to actively cut the allotted amount of road salt this winter, decreasing safety on dangerously icy roads, and local governments are decreasing funding for emergency services. More traffic accidents, but less revenue for salt and guard rails, coupled with decreased funding for fire and ambulance rescue agencies affect the safety of all citizens. Does the reassurance of having safe families and roadways surpass the need for recreation? Unfortunately the answer to this question lies within the power of elected officials who vote based on popularity in an election year.